Models, spatial imaging and functional endpoints for ADC studies
Start with target and model selection, then combine section-level spatial distribution, post-treatment morphology and dose response; add dedicated imaging and quantification when the study needs an intact-organoid view of penetration.
Match models and complementary endpoints to the candidate
Choose models from candidate format, target and tissue context, then combine spatial distribution, morphology, viability and dose response, with mechanism or normal-tissue safety studies added as needed.
Organizes imaging, efficacy and follow-up validation into one connected study plan
Connect spatial-distribution imaging with efficacy endpoints
Brings together frozen-section distribution data and complementary PDO morphology and dose-response data to show how imaging and functional endpoints work together in an ADC program.
Guides molecular-format, imaging, dose-window and candidate-comparison planning
01
Define the target and model context
Target expression, tissue architecture and candidate mechanism jointly determine the model and controls.
02
Frozen-section distribution imaging
Frozen-section images of labeled antibodies or nanobodies show relative distribution. Intact-organoid penetration depth requires a separate imaging and quantification design.
03
Compare ADC activity in a separate study
For the candidate, choose viability, apoptosis or bystander-effect endpoints and analyze activity separately from distribution imaging.
Raw imaging, quantitative outputs, analysis methods and a study report are delivered with the labels, doses and time points specified in the study plan.