R&D ServicesNavigation menu
R&D ServicesModels & ProductsApplicationsTechnologyEvidence & ResourcesHow We WorkAbout TRiCBIOBiobankProject inquiry中文

Target discovery services · Functional genomics

Target discovery with PDO 1.0 & PDO 2.0

Connect tumor-intrinsic mechanisms with microenvironmental function through PDO 1.0 and PDO 2.0 platforms for target discovery, genetic library screening and functional validation.

Build the target-discovery program around your R&D objectives, connecting model selection, genetic perturbation and functional validation through clear milestones and deliverables.

Organoid target discovery from genetic library screening and hit confirmation to functional validation and target prioritization
From library screening to target prioritization

R&D decisions

Build the model, screen and validation plan around your next decision

Candidate target validation

Does perturbing the target change a disease-relevant phenotype, and what supports further investment?

Dependencies & synthetic lethality

Which genes may be required in a defined molecular background, and how selective are those dependencies?

Resistance mechanisms & combination hypotheses

Which changes accompany resistance, and which interventions merit combination studies?

Immune-regulatory target exploration

How could perturbations in tumor or immune cells affect recognition and killing, and which models and readouts can test those effects?

PDO 1.0 + PDO 2.0 · Complementary research platforms

From tumor-intrinsic mechanisms to microenvironmental function

Either platform can provide a starting point for target research. Match models, perturbations and functional readouts to the question, with standalone studies or discovery and validation across complementary systems.

PDO 1.0

Explore tumor-intrinsic dependencies

Design candidate-gene validation, genetic library screening and resistance studies around tumor-cell growth, survival and drug response, connecting targets to tumor phenotypes.

Compare PDO 1.0 and PDO 2.0

PDO 2.0 / ALI

Explore microenvironment-associated targets and functions

Use tissue architecture, immune composition and molecular features to frame microenvironment-associated target hypotheses and design studies of tumor–immune interactions, immune recognition and killing, and drug response.

Explore PDO 2.0 / ALI
Connecting the platforms

Frame hypotheses from disease and molecular context, screen candidates in the model and assay context that fits the question, and connect PDO 1.0 tumor phenotypes with PDO 2.0 microenvironmental readouts for functional validation and target prioritization.

Genetic library screening & target prioritization

Genetic library screening in organoids

Design organoid perturbation and library-screening studies around disease mechanisms, drug sensitivity and resistance. Connect molecular features, functional phenotypes and independent validation to discover and prioritize candidate targets.

From research question to candidate targetsFive stages of a library-screening study
  1. 01

    Select models

    PDO 1.0 / PDO 2.0

    Match the research question
  2. 02

    Design libraries

    Genes, pathways & controls

    Define screening scope
  3. 03

    Perturb genes

    Delivery & perturbation checks

    Establish study groups
  4. 04

    Analyze the screen

    Sequencing or phenotype

    Prioritize candidate hits
  5. 05

    Validate targets

    Tumor & microenvironment readouts

    Inform R&D decisions
Comparison design
Control conditionDrug-treated or study condition

Connect perturbations with growth, survival and drug response to identify candidates for validation.

Target discovery & disease dependencies

Design focused libraries around disease-associated pathways or candidate gene sets to identify potential dependencies affecting organoid growth and survival.

Resistance & combination targets

Compare perturbation effects between drug-treated and control conditions to explore sensitivity, resistance mechanisms and combination strategies.

Functional validation of screening hits

Plan independent perturbations, molecular confirmation, functional assays and validation in additional models to inform target prioritization.

Study design considers genetic perturbation strategies such as CRISPR or RNA interference. The target gene set, model characteristics and pilot data guide library selection, screening scale, controls and sequencing or phenotypic readouts.

Discuss a library-screening study

TRiCBIO study results

How these study results support target discovery

01 · Target-informed model selection

Select matched samples for target research

Comparing TGF-β1 expression across candidate tissues under the same staining conditions helps select samples representing different target-expression backgrounds for subsequent PDO drug and mechanism studies.

Use these results to plan the target-expression backgrounds compared in the follow-on study.

TGF-β1 expression in lung cancer tissue: LC-026 on the left and LC-023 on the rightView image
Left: LC-026, moderate-to-high expression; right: LC-023, relatively low expression. Tissue sections, 1:200 staining; two fields per sample, with DAPI, TGF-β1 and merged channels from top to bottom.

02 · Gene delivery and expression

Gene delivery and expression in HCC organoids

Comparing organoid morphology and expression signals under scramble shRNA and lncRNA shRNA conditions informs experimental conditions for molecular confirmation and functional studies.

Explore gene delivery and perturbation studies
Scramble shRNAHCC organoids under scramble shRNA, day-3 bright-field and green fluorescence overlayView image
lncRNA shRNAHCC organoids under lncRNA shRNA, day-3 bright-field and green fluorescence overlayView image
Day-3 bright-field and green fluorescence overlays show morphology and expression after delivery.

03 · Cellular and molecular context

Use paired single-cell profiling to select study endpoints

Paired single-cell profiling of liver cancer tissue and a PDO identifies T-cell-related groups, B cells, macrophages and other populations available to support immune-associated target research.

Use that cellular context to select readouts for mechanistic studies and drug evaluation.

Source tissueSingle-cell groups and legend for liver cancer source tissueView image
Patient-derived organoidSingle-cell groups and legend for liver cancer PDOView image
One matched tissue–PDO pair, with independent embeddings; interpret cell groups using each panel’s legend.

Team research foundation

Move from genomic clues to functional validation

A Nature Medicine study involving a member of our team shows how candidate function can be tested: compare Igf2, miR-483 and their combination in Apc-deficient mouse colon organoids, then use histology, proliferation and invasion results to assess candidate driver function.

Li et al., Nature Medicine, 2014 · Fig. 5 ↗

Project deliverables

  • Project plan: model selection, perturbation strategy, experimental groups and quality criteria.
  • Project data: perturbation confirmation, functional assay data and candidate-target ranking.
  • Validation and recommendations: confirmation of key candidates, mechanistic interpretation and next-development priorities.

Ways to work together

Contract research & R&D collaboration

Contract research services

Tailor models, screening and validation to your targets, drug candidates and R&D questions, with experimental data, analytical reports and recommendations for follow-up studies.

Discuss a target-discovery project

Joint discovery & validation

Combine complementary models, data, technology and drug candidates to discover and validate targets, investigate mechanisms and advance promising research programs.

Discuss R&D collaboration

Building on target evidence and drug-candidate research, explore a collaborative path from joint discovery and functional validation toward drug co-development.

Field developments

Public studies are expanding organoid target discovery

Three peer-reviewed Nature studies published in August 2026 highlight practical directions for study design: larger patient-derived model resources, genome-wide CRISPR screening in organoids, and dependency maps that include additional cancer subtypes and cell states.

These public studies primarily use PDO 1.0 and other NextGen 3D cancer models, offering useful benchmarks for model coverage, screening scale and hit validation. Questions involving tissue architecture, immune context or microenvironmental function can also be evaluated with a PDO 2.0 study design.

Start with your target-discovery needs

For the initial discussion, share non-confidential disease context, candidate targets, available models or data, and the R&D decision you need to support.

Discuss a target-discovery project