Target and model assessment
Assess target location, intensity and heterogeneity, then define model-selection criteria.
Application
Compare antibody, multispecific and TCE responses in human tumor organoids, using target expression and immune activation to explain differences.

APPLICATION PATH
Conventional PDOs support standardized tumor-killing comparisons. When tissue architecture or sample-associated immune context matters, PDO 2.0 / ALI can add that layer alongside mechanism-matched effector cells and functional endpoints.
PDO 2.0 model images
PDAC PDO 2.0 images show epithelial and T-cell markers; renal PDO 2.0 images show PanCK and CD3 signals during culture. Candidate studies can add effector-cell, killing and immune-activation assays matched to the mechanism.
View imagePDAC tissue and PDO comparison: H&E and bright-field images show tissue morphology; CK19 labels epithelial cells and CD3 labels sample-associated T cells.
TRiCBIO PDAC PDO 2.0 study data
View imageTissue and model context: PanCK, CD3 and DAPI imaging compares tumor-epithelial and CD3-positive immune-cell signals across the source tissue and PDO culture time points.
TRiCBIO ccRCC PDO 2.0 immune-context study dataContinue to the PDAC and renal PDO 2.0 studies for model context and immune-assay evidence.
Study focus
Study workflow
Assess target location, intensity and heterogeneity, then define model-selection criteria.
Define effector source, E:T ratio, preconditioning and target-relevant positive and negative controls.
Combine live or endpoint imaging, viability/apoptosis, activation markers such as CD107a and cytokines.
Rank candidates by potency, response window and immune-activation profile under matched conditions.
Model options
We tailor the effector-cell source, E:T ratio and controls to the target and molecular format so killing, activation and cytokine readouts can support candidate comparison together.
PROJECT DISCUSSION
With the target, molecular format, tumor model and effector-cell conditions defined, we can design the relevant killing and activation comparisons.